Fantastic bystanders and where to find them: Do emotions fuel (in)direct interventions when bystanders face anti-LGBTQIA+ hostility on social media?

Author(s)
Melanie Saumer, Kevin Koban, Jörg Matthes
Abstract

Bystander interventions are increasingly recognized as a critical mechanism for countering anti-minority hostility in online spaces. This study investigates bystander reactions to anti-LGBTQIA+ hostility online, examining the interplay between emotional and cognitive processes in shaping intervention behaviors. A two-wave panel survey (W1: N = 1,491, W2: N = 1,032) was conducted to assess bystander responses to anti-LGBTQIA+ hostility. The study measured participants’ hostility exposure, emotional reactions (anger and sadness), and their direct and indirect intervention intentions. Findings show that 54.7% of participants witnessed anti-LGBTQIA+ hostility in the past month, indicating widespread exposure. While anger and sadness were common reactions, they did not consistently lead to intervention. Anger negatively affected indirect intervention, highlighting a complex link between emotions and action. Yet, hostility exposure strongly predicted intervention intentions, emphasizing the situational context’s role. Bystander interventions appear normatively driven, rather than purely emotional. Implications are discussed.

Organisation(s)
Department of Communication
Journal
Mass Communication and Society
ISSN
1520-5436
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/15205436.2026.2687034
Publication date
02-2026
Peer reviewed
Yes
Austrian Fields of Science 2012
508007 Communication science
ASJC Scopus subject areas
Communication
Portal url
https://ucrisportal.univie.ac.at/en/publications/a6db093c-1276-4fc0-9c9b-235a18248bb6